COVID Lawsuit Registered against the State of Ohio for Restricting Freedom for NO Legitimate Reason

Legal representative, Thomas Renz, has submitted a COVID Lawsuit Registered against the State of Ohio and also Governor Mike DeWine. Renz is requesting a trial by jury hearing.

This litigation ought to prompt extreme reaction out of the general public and every single attorney within hailing distance/range.

Below is the remarkable opening barrage/statement submission:

” In recent months, entire states have been imprisoned without due process and with the clear threat to impose such lock-downs again, interstate travel has been severely restricted, privacy rights have been devastated, numerous business takings without compensation, and many regulations being implemented without statutory process requirements under the guise of a health emergency that is roughly as dangerous as a seasonal influenza outbreak. The plaintiffs, in this case, have all been injured in various capacities by these unconstitutional actions, and without action by the Court, will be left without redress. More terrifying, without action by the Court, the Court will be setting a future precedent that will allow states to withhold fundamental Constitutional rights, in violation of US Supreme Court precedent, circumventing the various levels of scrutiny applied to such rights, and justify such actions under public health emergency orders without subjecting those orders to any real review– just trust the bureaucrats because they are the experts.”

Here is the most important point: “We humbly ask the Court in this case to … Recognize that the political process and operative orders are invalid and based on false and or misleading information … and assure that all future emergency orders be based and maintained on clear, honest facts – particularly when such orders are infringing on Constitutional rights.”

Simply put, “a declared State of Emergency situation should never be base an arbitrary ordinance”.

  • Facts really do matter.
  • Genuine scientific research really matters.
  • Reasons that an Emergency situation is declared matters.

Individuals can not be latched down or prevented from earning money – a living, and not having exposure/contact with other humans just because a state power chooses to give out this kind of order.

“If this lawsuit makes it to the courtroom, the doorway is going to open up to the presentation of facts along with scientific research”, said the attorney.

Renz, for the litigants, is definitely aware of that, and even his submission is studded using strong and precise assertions of truth:

” Basing on the latest information coming from the Ohio COVID-19 Control panel, we can easily observe that the ‘surge’ with cases is in fact merely a spike with tests. The State started with around1000 assessments daily then jumped to 25,000 assessments each day. The positivity rate, when it comes to COVID-19, has actually stayed relatively even, however, there have been a lot more tests.”

” The moment the state of Emergency was proclaimed/declared people listened to a daily drumbeat relating to the threat, and fatalities/deaths associated with COVID-19. Since the death rate has been revealed to be like annual influenza … those [dying] figures are not really terrifying to the general public. Consequently, the State will NOT speaking about death numbers, and has as an alternative started testing even more so they can say to us that there are more cases.”

” The PCR tests have typically been the way or method of identifying if an individual possesses/has COVID-19. The concern is that the creator of the PCR exam/test, who earned a Nobel Prize for biochemistry and biology for its development, exclusively said that the testing was NOT well-suited to and never fashioned to determine the disease/virus. A lot has been generated regarding this in the media, still, the main reason there are problems using PCR screening in connection with COVID is that PCR screening can not actually spot the amount of a virus present within a man or woman. The presence of insufficient indications regarding a virus does not confirm a certain person is contaminated [,] that is really part of the main reason the PCR examinations feature an increased level of false positives.”

Compulsory coronavirus test could get travellers back in the air | News | The Times

” … currently, there isn’t even a correct benchmark regard screening … Rather, we have many testings coming from a number of suppliers that might or might not actually have a comparable standard of what it really means to ‘catch/spot’ COVID-19. The CDC, The Governor, as well as ODH [Ohio Office of Health And Wellness], understand that and so these people allowed for the medical diagnosis of cases based upon as worthless qualifying criteria such as a simple cough where COVID allegedly is present.”

Yet another document emerged that is really crucial with showing the egregiously deceptive attributes of the general public COVID-19 information. In the last sentences of post/page, 39 regarding documentation distributed through the FDA relating to directions to COVID-19 testing is the following quotation: ‘Since no quantified virus isolates the 2019-nCoV, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/ μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen’.”.

” In traditional English, that indicates that there are absolutely NO available pure 2019-CoV virus isolates in order to check against, therefore, as an alternative, an educated assumption or guess is being employed or used. The question this leads all of us to is, how precise can a test be with respect to a virus which has NEVER been actually identified …? If our rights are to be reduced/restricted/taken away by an emergency declaration associated with a condition/virus, should it not be a condition that the illness at the very least is TRULY defined?”.

This case is without a doubt being contended not necessarily just on Constitutional reasons/Merrit, but insignificant and deeper matters regarding scientific research. The litigants will NOT be taking “the Word of the self-proclaimed experts.”.

Currently/today, there is absolutely NO reason why we should give up and accept anything blindly.

Within the State of Ohio, a bright illumination/light is radiating within the darkness.

Leave a comment

(*) Required, Your email will not be published